Wednesday, November 7, 2007

boys vs. girls in the world series of cum




i was talking with a 50-something-year-old female client today. we were talking about her love life (or lack thereof) and i asked if she wants to be in a relationship. she said yes and then went on to say that she has sexual needs. she said a lot of women her age claim to never think about sex. "i think they are all lying," says my client, "or brainwashed by the masses."

i explain to her that women in our country are socialized to refrain from admitting to liking sex. she said, "no, that's not it. it's about cumming."

intrigued i ask her to elaborate. she said, "guys can cum so easily. if they got a prostitute they could just have sex with her without having to see her face and cum. for women, it takes more than that to make us cum. we're more complicated."

hmmm. . . "go on," i say.

"guys are indiscriminate, they can do it with anyone. women have to discriminate more because it's harder for us to cum. if we could cum more easily, we'd probably be more indiscriminate too."

so - what do YOU think?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I think one can find a conspiracy in anything if they just want to believe it's there. I don't think the idea of males or females being disriminate or indiscriminate has anything at all to do with the ability (or inability) to achieve climax. I don't think it takes a rocket scientist to figure out the biology of our sexuality is tied to evolution. What are the benefits of males being able to achieve climax more quickly, more often, and with millions (or more) sperm in every ejaculate? What are the benefits of it being the opposite for females? Society does in fact put unnecessary pressures upon females and their sexuality but it also manages to place some on males as well. For every time "slut" is thrown around "dog" or "player" gets is fair share of mileage.